Advisory asking BOS to consider adopting meal tax

by beth on November 4, 2019

Tomorrow night, the Board of Selectmen’s meeting will include a joint session with the Advisory Committee. The topic will be the option of adding a local meal tax.

The option to round up the tax on eatery’s checks to 7%, with the additional 0.75% going to the Town is something that has been nixed in the past. This time, the option is being revisited at the request of the Advisory Committee. Advisory Chair Kathy Cook’s memo reminded that every surrounding town except for Hopkinton has been charging the tax.

Advisory anticipates the tax would bring in an additional $120K per year while only adding 38ยข to a family’s $50 restaurant bill. 

As for the impact to restaurants, Cook wrote:

Advisory believes that the benefits of adding the local tax far outweigh any con. The only downside to adopting the local meals tax is that local businesses will have to re-program their software to add the new tax. The tax is a pass-thru so is paid by the customer just like the customers currently pay the state meals tax. We do not believe that an additional .75% added on to a meal check will cost our local businesses any revenue.

Back in 2009, when selectmen considered adding the tax, Owen O’Leary’s owner lobbied against it, worrying it would hurt the restaurant’s bottom line.  Selectmen again rejected it in 2011 while supporting a hospitality tax (that passed at Town Meeting). It came up in discussion in 2014, but wasn’t pursued, though there were plenty of opinions about it on the blog. Most commenters were against additional taxes in principal.

If the Board and Advisory agree to move forward on a tax, it would still need to be approved by Town Meeting this spring. If it passed, it would go into effect on July 1st.

You can read Cook’s full memo here.

Just a few more facts to give a little more context. . . 

  • Southborough currently has only five traditional restaurants with wait staff. But the tax also covers takeout and counter service eateries, adding at least 13 more establishments. (Plus it looks like there may be a few food services in office buildings.)
     
  • While some have advocated that not having the tax could be a selling point versus other towns, it’s worth noting that your bill doesn’t break it out as an extra line. That means, most customers likely don’t notice which bills do/don’t have the extra tax. (If you’re paying at a coffee chain using a phone app, you’re even less likely to notice.)
     
  • Advisory’s memo mentions that there is a state bill that could double the local tax to 1.5%. (Obviously, that would mean more revenue, but also a bigger impact on consumers.)
  • It may surprise some to know that adding the pass through meal tax is something that the Economic Development Committee had also been looking into meal taxes earlier this year. Their January 4th discussion focused on having at least half of the tax dedicated to EDC. Later that month, the group agreed that a lot of homework would need to be done on opinions. The item was tabled for future discussion.
     
  • Advisory unanimously voted in favor of recommending a meal tax in July. At that time, they didn’t identify any specific uses of the funds. 

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

1 another_good_idea! November 4, 2019 at 5:45 PM

Let’s see if we can get the restaurants to move out of town! We’ve managed to vacate almost all of 225 Turnpike Road and 254 Turnpike Road has been vacant for I don’t know how long.

The restaurant at the corner of Parkerville and route 9 has been vacant for years and is currently used as an overflow parking lot for Prime Volvo. Hopefully, they’re staying for a while…

The EDC is focused on downtown and we cannot retain businesses on a main corridor?

How about raising revenue by bringing businesses to town? Adding a tax to meals just adds to a resident’s existing tax burden. Time to get residential property taxes under control by adding commercial interests to the rolls.

Reply

2 Frank Crowell November 4, 2019 at 7:17 PM

What’s easier to do: raise taxes or cut expenses?

Has Advisory Board ever asked the school committee why our per student expense is significantly higher than surrounding towns? What would be the total tax savings be if Southborough student expense equaled Hopkinton? Has the number of schools been investigated? Do we have too many classrooms for the student population?

Yes, it is easier to raise taxes.

Reply

3 Neil Rossen November 5, 2019 at 7:42 AM

Another tax increase posing as a rounding error. I guess just another tax and spend proposal

Reply

4 southsider November 5, 2019 at 8:58 AM

Might be a good way to funnel a steady stream of money every year towards the support of our growing OPEB obligations. The projected value of these Other Post Employment Benefits is already in the millions of dollars and eventually, these bills will all come due.

Reply

5 beth November 5, 2019 at 9:21 AM

The last time I recall selectmen discussing the option it was during a discussion of how to fund OPEB.

Reply

Cancel reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: