Open discussion thread: Ask questions, share opinions

It’s time for another open thread. What’s on your mind this week, Southborough?

For those of you new to the blog, the open discussion thread is your place to ask questions, sound off on town issues, or share information with other readers. Here are some suggestions to get you started:

  • Ask questions about programs in town or the town itself
  • Post a note about things that you’re selling or giving away, or things that you want
  • Share notices about upcoming events (Southborough or otherwise)
  • Register your thoughts on town issues or news stories
  • Point out interesting or helpful resources

You can add comments to the thread throughout the week. Check back often to see new comments. (If you read the blog via email or RSS, you might want to check the site from time to time for new comments.)

To view past open discussion threads, click here.

(Photo by Susan Fitzgerald)

22 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Water
8 years ago

Does anyone know why all the water levels in the surrounding reservoirs are so far down?

Water
8 years ago
Reply to  Beth Melo

Guess I could have done that! Didn’t even think of googling. Thanks for the info.

JMO
8 years ago

I read in the newspaper that the intent is to kill the roots of the invasive plants in the water by freezing them. The water levels will be brought back up at a later date.

Cindy R.
8 years ago
Reply to  JMO

good luck freezing the plants!! Maybe January!

Chris
8 years ago

FWIW I drive by the Cambridge Reservoir in Waltham (by the Winter St. exit) and the reservoir is even lower than the ones in Southborough.

Rob
8 years ago

I have a problem with the town making Mac’s wraps take down his covered entrance because of a zoning or building issue. The town has granted dozens if not hundreds of waivers for large builders, and others, for almost every project I can think of. How many waivers were given to the Deerfoot Estates, Park Central, Neary-Trotier complex or any other development built in town? The owner of the land allowed him to do this and it bothers no one else. It just doesn’t sit well with me, and doesn’t seem right.

Frank Crowell
8 years ago
Reply to  Rob

I had no idea this was in town. Great reviews on Yelp. Will have to stop in for some good food. Pulled Pork Barrito – got to give that a try.

Cindy R.
8 years ago
Reply to  Rob

When I saw that he put that up I wondered if anyone was going to make a stink about it. That’s too bad. For Dec. – Feb. they should give him a variance.

Burrito Bandit
8 years ago
Reply to  Beth Melo

It’s a shame, hopefully it gets sorted out. Mac’s is the only decent lunch food in the town, really. Pulled Pork burritos till I explode!

Local eater
8 years ago

I have to disagree–macs is ok but as sOmeone who works nearby, I prefer other options. You have to try Mauro’s if you haven’t been lately. Maybe due to more competition, but they have upped their game. All Boarshead meats, great wraps, and new specials all the time. Red Barn (both Southboro locations) are also great lunch choices (great steak chili!!). And that Japanese place near Dunkin Donuts is really good and they have great lunch prices. Southboro finally has food options. Now if we could just get the pizza place in the old fire station to improve their pizza and salads….

Kevin
8 years ago

It is a shame. Mac’s Wrap’s is excellent, and his pulled pork is fantastic. Great food all around. Best in the downtown sboro area.

southborough resident
8 years ago

Mac’s Wraps is the only decent place to eat in Southborough, period.

Pat D
8 years ago

This is all a matter of opinion . . . and likes/dislikes. I, for one, do not like pulled pork and I definitely do not like wraps. So you eat at Mac’s and I will eat at Mauro’s Cafe, known by the oldsters in town as “the Spa”. Much better food, ambiance and variety particularly since Dean is the new chef.

DLD
8 years ago

As a side note, I think the ownership at Mauro’s Cafe has done such a lovely job sprucing up the exterior of the building. From the plantings and arrangements in the beds out front, to the windows and new awning, it really looks nice. As someone who grew up here and loves to complain about the sorry state of our downtown area, I am so grateful to see things looking better for a change.

Dave
8 years ago
Reply to  DLD

I wonder why…

Al Hamilton
8 years ago

An interesting thing, worth far more discussion, happened on the way to figuring out if we could afford a new Public Safety Complex. The Advisory committee formed a subcommittee to study the long term budget and our borrowing capacity.

When the committee did their analysis they had to do 2 things.

1. Figure out what other large debt needs there might be over 20 years

2. Build a long term model of town finances. This is the interesting part (ok, I am a numbers nerd).

First the good news, Even if we decide to build a new Library (partly state funded like schools) and a new Rec/Senior Center we can afford to build a public safety facility. It is within our prudent capacity to fund if we choose to do so.

Now the Bad News. There has been a decades long trend for the cost of Government to rise faster than the value of the Tax Base. The solution to this has been an ever increasing tax rate. Our current rate is in the $16 per thousand of assessed value. In the advisory analysis, this rate will continue to rise (it was $8 or $9 when I moved to town nearly 20 years ago). The committee believes that in the next 13 years it will rise to $25 (Take your current tax bill and multiply by about 1.6).

Regardless of whether you think of the tax rate increasing to to $25 is a good thing or not. Prop 2.5 does not allow the tax rate to increase beyond this level for operating budgets.

Borrowing or not borrowing the money for a public safety facility changed the day or reckoning by about a year but that day is coming when, absent a change in prop 2.5, the cost of Government will not be permitted to rise faster than the value of the tax base.

This issue deserves a lot more discussion and visibility.

https://southboroughadvisory.shutterfly.com/26/1206

John Butler
8 years ago

For anyone who is interested in a non-video summary, the link that Al offers at the end of his post provides access to a short presentation (.ppt file) that summarizes the same points that Al makes in his letter. The spreadsheet analysis, not designed for light reading, is also on the Advisory website. The analysis was discussed at some length at the last Advisory Committee meeting (not video recorded) at which members of the Board of Selectmen and Public Safety Committee were also present. It was re-presented, in summary form, at the last Board of Selectmen meeting.

The main point, as Al says, is that the analysis says that we are headed toward $25+ tax rates, which may be regarded as an intrinsic problem and which clashes with current law. Advisory Committee has not taken up the topic of what can be done about this.

Al Hamilton
8 years ago
Reply to  John Butler

As I see it there are only 3 possible solutions

1. The legislature changes the law and effectively negates this part (or all) of Prop 2.5

2. The legislature does not act and our operating expense is effetively capped (look for massive pressure to “revalue” the tax base in this case.

3. Town Meeting begins to say NO. There will be no internal pressure to innovate, become more efficient, or make hard choices until the Towns Legislature begins to reject budget proposals. We do not have a track record of doing so.

Southborough will not be the first community to hit this wall.

  • © 2024 MySouthborough.com — All rights reserved.